More Upcoming Events

First, a workshop for PhD students:

Now some conferences that just happened (And that I failed to report in a more timely way. But I take it that conference reports, like good travel writing, are of interest even when the trip is impossible to make):

Next, some conferences you might actually attend without the aid of time travel:

Finally, last time I posted information about conferences, Lucian Petrescu commented by simply pasting in the URL of the Pariscope médiéval website. And, indeed, if you go to the monthly conference listing, you will find a wealth of information about medieval events in France — along with much other useful information.



  • The University of Geneva is advertising a position for study toward a PhD in medieval Latin philosophy.
  • The Society for Medieval and Renaissance Philosophy is accepting submissions for their 2015 Founder’s award: the best paper on Medieval or Renaissance philosophy by a younger scholar. See here for details.
  • The Aquinas and the Arabs group is running its Third Online International Live Video Graduate Student Workshop on Feb. 20-21. See information here.
  • Dag Hasse has begun work on an Arabic and Latin Glossary: “a dictionary of the vocabulary of the Arabic–Latin translations of the Middle Ages.”  So far, only the letters B and C are complete, but what’s there is quite impressive.
  • Sam Rickless has broken new ground in historical scholarship with a series of “101 philosophical limericks, spanning the history of western philosophy.” You’ll have some time to reflect on what might rhyme with ‘Aquinas’ and ‘Scotus,’ because he’s posting only 1 a day, beginning with Thales.

Do we need an open-access book series?

(My apologies, in advance, for posting something as long as this has turned out to be. But my question takes a while to pose.)

I have been feeling, for some time now, a growing disconnect between the publishing options that are available to scholars and the state of technology we now possess to disseminate information.

When it comes to journals, the situation seems fairly good. There are a reasonable number of journals that publish medieval philosophy, and I have never heard anyone in the medieval community say that there is good work out there that cannot find a home in some journal or another. These journals are, for the most part, reasonably priced, and widely available to scholars everywhere. Moreover, if one looks at the broader scene in philosophy, there are clear signs that the open-access movement is making inroads. (By ‘open access’ I mean free to the world on the internet. See, in particular, Philosophers’ Imprint and Ergo. It is unfortunate that the new Journal of the APA is not open access. But perhaps that will change if APA members continue to complain.)

When it comes to book-length work, however, the situation is rather different. Here, too, I have never heard a scholar in our field complain that good work cannot get published. And there are certainly many excellent presses that contribute in essential ways to the growth of scholarship in our field. But it seems to me there is a growing gap in book publishing between the interests of publishers and the interests of scholars. Publishers must, if they are to stay in business, charge serious amounts of money for their books, and do everything in their power to impede the free electronic dissemination of those books. But this is not what scholars want. What we mainly want is that the work be made available to as many people as possible.

For centuries, these two interests were inseparably connected. But the internet, of course, has changed everything. And in the last few years we are beginning to see not just the technical capacity to spread information electronically, but a shift in reading habits that makes it the case, for many purposes, that electronic copies of books are just as good as the real thing. Indeed, I hesitate even to say that electronic books are not the real thing. (When it comes to journals, print copies are already a quaint curiosity.)

My query, then, is whether we need some sort of venue for publishing open-access book-length material in medieval philosophy. It seems to me that historians of philosophy in general, and perhaps especially medievalists, could particularly benefit from such a resource. For there are, in our field, a great many technical scholarly resources that are of immense value to a very small number of people. I am thinking of editions of texts, translations, extremely specialized studies, conference proceedings, and so on and so forth. The problem, as I say, is not so much that this material cannot find a publisher, but that the more obscure it is, the more expensive it naturally tends to be. So even while it remains possible to find a publisher willing to print some recondite medieval work for, say, $150, the question we should ask ourselves is whether this way of doing things is in the best interests of the field. Would it not be better, in many cases, to make this material freely available?

Of course, anyone can post anything on the web (as this blog shows so well!). But the trouble, of course, is that we all need our work to bear the imprimatur of a reputable publisher. We need that for our careers, and our work needs that, if other scholars are going to take it seriously. So in putting forth the idea of an open-access book series, I have in mind something that would, somehow, take on the prestige of a serious publishing venture. It would have to be selective in what it published, which means it would need to have the same sorts of refereeing procedures that publishing houses currently have. The advantage would not be that this is an easy way to get published; the advantage would be that this is a way of making work readily available to the whole world.

The project would require some support, since (as any publisher reading this is doubtless thinking) it is not easy to take a Word file and turn it into the beautiful published products that we take for granted. But it is another feature of the current state of technology that the production process has become much less difficult than it used to be. Moreover, I happen to have a certain amount of funding that could be used as a seed grant to begin this project.

What would this series publish? It is certainly not intended to compete with major academic presses when it comes to publishing original monographs. Scholars who need tenure, promotion, a better job, etc. will need, for the foreseeable future, to publish with the most reputable presses. But it seems to me there is a great deal of material that might be published in a series such as this. To begin with, there might be older material, not under copyright, that might be part of the series, such as

  • classic unpublished dissertations;
  • old editions (e.g., Jansen’s 3-volume edition of Olivi?);
  • old translations.

Then there might be new work that would be better served by open-access publishing, such as

  • English translations of monographs originally published in French, German, etc.;
  • conference proceedings;
  • new editions and translations of texts.

I’m posting this in the hopes of getting (a) general feedback about whether this is a good idea, and (b) specific ideas about work that might be part of the series, as well as (c) advice about the practicalities of making such a series happen. Feel free to respond either by commenting on this post, below, or by emailing me directly.


Job Market

Although, for some readers of this blog, there is doubtless nothing they would like to think about less, others may like to know what jobs were advertised this past fall in medieval philosophy. (In North America, I mean. Europe remains an alien continent to me, as far as the job market goes.)

Here then, is a list, which I owe to my brilliant and for the moment still job-seeking student Joey Stenberg.

Category 1: AOS: Medieval alone
1. University of San Diego (Open rank)
2. Salve Regina (Assistant Professor)

Category 2: AOS: Open, but Medieval listed as a preferred option
1. Indiana University-Purdue University – Fort Wayne (Assistant Professor)
2. University of North Carolina – Asheville (Assistant Professor)

Category 3: AOS: Open, AOC: Medieval mentioned
1. Siena Heights University (Assistant Professor)
2. Emory University’s Oxford College (Assistant Professor)
3. Saint Leo University (Assistant or Associate)

NEH in Boulder

This July 6th to 31st, I am leading an NEH Summer Institute entitled Between Medieval and Modern: Philosophy from 1300 to 1700. We will be studying various aspects of the long transition from medieval to early modern thought. Participants receive a $3300 stipend.

Unfortunately, participation is limited to teachers at U.S. colleges and universities. There are three positions available to graduate students, but in general the program is aimed at scholars who have completed their education. See eligibility details here.

In addition to the 20 participants, there will be an all-star cast of visiting scholars from week to week:

  • Deborah Brown
  • Edwin Curley
  • Daniel Garber
  • Peter King
  • Christia Mercer
  • Calvin Normore
  • Alison Simmons

The application deadline is March 2.  If you’re interested in spending four weeks in beautiful Colorado, I hope you’ll apply.